Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Anthony Bourdain’s Incessant Love Affair


Bourdain apparently is a man who has an impassioned relationship with food, an idea that is patently obvious for two reasons. Notice first the manner in which he explains his relationship with food. Bourdain’s rate of compositional speed leaves him dazzling in a category all his own. Whether he is sampling vatapa and forofa at the beloved ‘Sorriso da DadĂ ’ or sharing chops beachfront with carioca while enjoying little fried cakes with cachaca served in coconuts by women wearing white skirts with traditional headdress, we are left with an eclectic montage of savory explicits, if I could qualify the noun. Wondering through the streets of Bahia with Bourdain leaves you feeling emotionally involved with his dining experiences in ‘cobble-stoned Colonial neighborhoods’ or on beaches situated between ‘eighteenth-century lighthouses and open-aired restaurants on a bluff at the other end.’ Usually there is a noticeable experience that trumps all the rest in any given location leaving you satisfied and happy you went along, much like the feeling found at Barra, and everyone knows it can’t be as blissful all of the time, but one is hopeful.

Despite the delicious wonder charmed on every page by this fluent necromancer of the printed word we are sometimes stunned by his sharp criticism and biting wit which inevitably ends up charging the reader with as much pomp as a self-righteous vicar; our palates are crystallized with Bourdain’s words and we become instant food snobs. Nestled some where between each escalating rendezvous we find that Bourdain does in fact have a shelf for words used to express his disdain like ‘insipid California rolls.’ What!? I don’t even have to reach for a dictionary to know what he means. Whenever he uses the adjectives touristy and chewy we know to look out for places like that. Another clear indication of a less than desirable experience can hang on the noticeable expression of a friend,

‘Taka’s face, previously filled with enthusiasm as he discussed the films of Werner Herzog, went slack as he laid eyes on the limp graying tuna,’[1]

Whether it is Bourdain’s expressive disdain for terrible Sushi and gnawing use of perilous adjectives or the way he captures the moment of ‘paradise’ we can appreciate the marvelous relationship with food by the way he explains it.

This leads us to the second detail highlighting this intimate relationship that can be summed up with a question. What does Bourdain love more, eating the food or writing about it? A fairly presumptuous question indeed but one I feel is critical to understanding the man’s work because without this incessant love affair with food Bourdain is a fish out of water. I will go as far as stating on the one hand that he could write about eating an MRE (a Meal Ready-to-Eat) in the trenches amidst a war with all its misery and ungodly quarters familiar to any veteran and Bourdain could make money in the process, but the moment you take the MRE away the white flag goes up. In other words, Bourdain could be writing about his experience in a soup kitchen under a bridge in lower Manhattan and we would love him for it, but as soon as the tray of food is removed his adjectives would become brass and fall to the floor, the expressions on the patrons beside him would wind up on the canvas of the pandering caricature artist outside the front doors and his ink would dry up like gravy on a lapel right before the nap on thanksgiving day.

For me, it is this romantic relationship Bourdain shares with his food that draws readers into the dynamic; Bourdain’s work is completely infused with his passion and it remains the envy of some, especially those who 'live to eat.’

‘Bottom’s up!’





[1] Anthony Bourdain, The Nasty Bits, Brazilian Beach-Blanket Bingo, p. 222

No comments:

Post a Comment